Transcript of #editorchat 6/10
[21:54:16] deannatroupe: @SandyDaley No it wasn’t just you. It stopped for me too. #editorchat
[21:54:18] ssbohio: .@TimOBrienNYT One of the saving graces of #Wikipedia is it reinforces readers’ need to consider sources’ & authors’ credibility #editorchat
[21:54:24] TimOBrienNYT: Yes, absolutely, especially online RT @kbeninato disclaimers for business and personal relationships. #editorchat
[21:54:26] deannatroupe: I think we broke it. #editorchat
[21:56:10] thisdog: #editorchat good conversations. Apologies if I’m too quarrelsome. Learned a lot 2 night. Thanks all. Tweet University?
[21:56:29] BenFrench: Lots of interesting tweets coming out of #editorchat right now.
[21:57:24] retheauditors: @timobriennyt An interesting rumor from a reliable source is a great story for me. #editorchat
[21:58:12] kbeninato: @TimOBrienNYT Yes, it’s crucial to building online credibility. Hey, somehow #editorchat ended and I missed the ending.
[21:58:41] SpecialDee: Great #editorchat 2nite re getting breaking news online, risks, links, value. See me at http://specialdee.wordpress.com Thanks!
[21:59:01] mathewi: @TimOBrienNYT: not saying it’s not important or valuable – just saying it’s a spectrum, not a fence #editorchat
[22:00:16] muckrack: Now trending on Muck Rack: #editorchat http://bit.ly/ftBCy
[22:00:50] palafo: RT @jason_pontin: Follow @TimOBrienNYT tonight, who’s getting all freaky on #editorchat.
[22:01:13] bacigalupe: RT @KakieF When you begin writing, do you always know what the intended outcome is? #editorchat
[22:02:21] deegospel: @LydiaBreakfast @milehighfool Thanks for a great chat. Despite #fail the chat was needed. #editorchat
[22:02:26] anndouglas: RT @retheauditors An interesting rumor from a reliable source is a great story for me. #editorchat
[22:03:46] BillHarper: @anndouglas @SuburbNews I also like the idea of showing corrections in the story, rather than just changing it ala 1984. #editorchat
[22:04:22] TimOBrienNYT: @mathewi running into Jarvis zone of circular reasoning & glib marketing words (fence, spectrum). there are universal standards #editorchat
[22:05:06] anndouglas: Fascinating discussion on and off #editorchat tonight about rumors vs. facts in reporting. @mathewi and @TimOBrienNYT still discussing issue
[22:05:47] KakieF: @bacigalupe Thank you so much for the RT #editorchat
[22:06:26] mathewi: @TimOBrienNYT: there are standards (multiple sources, no anonymous, etc) that are broken in certain cases — that’s a spectrum #editorchat
[22:06:40] KakieF: @JDEbberly hmmm, thanks for sharing. #editorchat
[22:07:18] KakieF: So who is continuing the conversation since we were offline for 15 minutes? #editorchat
[22:08:25] SuburbNews: Trying to draw @jeffjarvis into another round? RT @palafo: RT @jason_pontin: Follow @TimOBrienNYT who’s getting all freaky on #editorchat
[22:08:33] tomfeyer: I recommend interesting if somwhat disjointed #editorchat
[22:08:38] KakieF: ???? #editorchat
[22:08:51] ljthornton: RT @SuburbNews: Due 2 fewer bodies, eyes 2 edit stories b4 postings, our newsroom having sessions w/lawyer on defamation, etc. #editorchat
[22:09:09] journik: @TimOBrienNYT speculation CAN be journalism — just not “news.” @milehighfool: @bacigalupe #editorchat
[22:09:56] TimOBrienNYT: @mathewi standard is you’ve made a good-faith effort to verify and believe it’s true. rest of what you’re citing are metrics #editorchat
[22:09:57] KakieF: Did I mention my blog got a nomination by Nickelodeon’s Parent Picks as Best Blog in Minneapolis St. Paul? Voting goes until Jul #editorchat
